So… I get lots of crazy responses on just about everything I do. But some of the stupidest ones recently are those which state that my experiment showing illumination of the underside of clouds was due to the reflection off my table (which had a non-reflective table cloth on it). Such stupidity was just begging for a response. And this is it.
Video Source
38 Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Ballturds need to deal with reality, the reality that we all live On a flanet
Thank you, Rob. We all love you and many are praying for you and yours, including your work. The light (truth) cannot be hidden under a table no matter how much you try or how much money or strength you have. The light will leak out like so much water behind a cracked cement dam full to the brim. 🙂 My husband forbade me last year from posting FE stuff on phasebook anymore, so I stopped; even unsubscribing from all the FE pages. After seeing your newest videos from Amsterdam, my heart was again abuzz with the joy I have always felt from knowing my Creator and the beautiful place He prepared for us to live in. I won't move this time. I will go forward with a heart and mind for God and will continue to post and warn and attempt to shed light in the dark places. Thank you for all the work that you do to glorify the God of all creation, praise be to His holy name, YHWH! (however you want to say it) 🙂
Rob Skiba I have one question: why some od your videos have locked comments?
The balltard jingle was funny. I needed that laugh. Thanks Rob.
Ok, flatard, you talk about balltards? You are a one-track, close-minded, fraudulent person or just a plain ignoramus. Go to Sly Sparkane's debunk of your silly illusionist test and try to get out of any of his comments about the test. Also, here is a copy of part of my comment under his video:
Rob 'Schemer' Skiba obviously has no clue about different zoom lenses either. The old test showing a car about 50 yards in front of a barn with the picture taken from the same distance away each time, taken with an 500mm lens, the barn is virtually hidden with only the car taking up the frame, taken with a 100mm lens, more of the barn is seen than of the car, a 50mm lens, the barn dwarfs the car, an 18mm lens, the barn and car are only a portion of the big picture.
The looming only affects the upwards stretching of the buildings at or just beyond the horizon, unlike a magnifying glass which would stretch it in all directions. If it did stretch it sideways, say by 20%, the whole horizon would have to stretch 20% to accommodate this, so try fitting a 120% horizon into a 100% horizon slot.
I have sent Schemer comments, copied them to his discussion page, and also emailed them to him as well, concerning the major inconsistencies and blatant errors/lies in his latest videos, and the coward has failed to respond to any of them. Talk about a loser! He is on a par now with Antonio Sewer-rat, Jeranism, TheMorgile, RussianVids, Mark Sargent, Chippy Chipmunk, HillSillyBilly and some others.