I don’t buy this guy’s theory and for reasons I’m appalled nobody else has mentioned. For starters (this isn’t my main point but I’m just throwing this out there) the guy got these images from the Vatican. That’s enough said right there. Second off, the whole underground thing reeks of paganism. The only time (if I’m not mistaken) that the Jews would go underground to worship in the Old Testament was to play with a little Baal and Tammuz. Rumor has it that the good old child molesters at the Vatican still play with Tammuz and Semiramis to this day which is why they hold sacred the mother of God whereas the Bible does not. The Bible (New Testament in this context) holds Jesus as sacred. Another thing I don’t agree with is the guy’s theory that early Christians would go underground and draw art in disguise because Christianity was illegal at that time. Well they were underground where they had privacy. In top of that idk of any Christians even today that wouldn’t draw actual Jesus stuff instead of disguising it. And my last point is this (and I think it is important to note): according to the Bible (New Testament), there were several warnings of false teachers sneaking in to the church to lead them astray, even going as far as to say that some of them were already mixed in with them. So I find it funny that the time frame the guy in this video mentioned would line up with that of the aftermath of false doctrine spreading throughout Christian groups. I also found it funny that the documents came from the devil… I mean the Vatican. Now I’m no Christian but I have studied the Bible for years and one thing that has shown me is one: the Bible is inconsistent in some areas and 2: most people don’t actually study the Bible like they claim to because a lot of Christian’s are ignorant of their own Bible. Go freaking figure. But what I’ve just given you was my unbiased review of everything – minus the Vatican being the devil and all – but would that be biased if there’s evidence to support that claim? Idk. You can decide.
you know shit's really deep when Joe goes "ihmm"
This is a Jewish ritual not Christians
Pouring out liquor for the dead homies has religious origin. Doesn’t everything. Nothing is new under the sun right?
Truly incredible content!
I don’t buy this guy’s theory and for reasons I’m appalled nobody else has mentioned. For starters (this isn’t my main point but I’m just throwing this out there) the guy got these images from the Vatican. That’s enough said right there. Second off, the whole underground thing reeks of paganism. The only time (if I’m not mistaken) that the Jews would go underground to worship in the Old Testament was to play with a little Baal and Tammuz. Rumor has it that the good old child molesters at the Vatican still play with Tammuz and Semiramis to this day which is why they hold sacred the mother of God whereas the Bible does not. The Bible (New Testament in this context) holds Jesus as sacred. Another thing I don’t agree with is the guy’s theory that early Christians would go underground and draw art in disguise because Christianity was illegal at that time. Well they were underground where they had privacy. In top of that idk of any Christians even today that wouldn’t draw actual Jesus stuff instead of disguising it. And my last point is this (and I think it is important to note): according to the Bible (New Testament), there were several warnings of false teachers sneaking in to the church to lead them astray, even going as far as to say that some of them were already mixed in with them. So I find it funny that the time frame the guy in this video mentioned would line up with that of the aftermath of false doctrine spreading throughout Christian groups. I also found it funny that the documents came from the devil… I mean the Vatican. Now I’m no Christian but I have studied the Bible for years and one thing that has shown me is one: the Bible is inconsistent in some areas and 2: most people don’t actually study the Bible like they claim to because a lot of Christian’s are ignorant of their own Bible. Go freaking figure. But what I’ve just given you was my unbiased review of everything – minus the Vatican being the devil and all – but would that be biased if there’s evidence to support that claim? Idk. You can decide.