It’s been a week since I put out my response to the challenges of Dr. Robert Sungenis and Dr. Hovind to debate the issue of flat Earth. In that previous video, I offered a counter-challenge for Dr. Hovind to debate Dr. Sungenis FIRST. I said I would then take the winner. After I posted that video, I started to see lots of comments on social media stating that I was a “coward” and that I “chickened out” and allegedly declined to debate. None of that is true and I am addressing these issues here in this video – along with a variety of other topics.
Originally, I created a longer version of this (the “longer video” I referred to in the last video), but I decided to edit this down to about half the length, mainly because I realized the other stuff wasn’t going to go anywhere anyway. But my hope is that what I’ve included here will.
At any rate, the bottom line is, will Kent Hovind debate Robert Sungenis on heliocentricity vs geocentricity according to the Bible? Almost immediately, I received a response from Dr. Sungenis, saying that he’d be happy to debate Kent. We’re still waiting for Dr. Hovind’s response.
NOTE: Many of the clips of the scientists talking were taken from the documentary, The Principle:
https://www.theprinciplemovie.com
Video Source
You can win the debate with Robert Sungenis, watch the videos on the YouTube channel called: Sensus Fidelium, they made a conference against evolution, and the Big Bang, and in favor of a young earth, it is a Catholic conference and Sungenis spoke against flat earth but the only argument was, according to him, that in Hebrew, the word raqya that means hard, it is mentioned truly but it says "birds are flying inside raqya' instead of under raqya, so he assumes then than raqya is not actually something hard. He doesn't have any other argument.