The first part of this was a pre-debate discussion I had with Zen Garcia in an interview he did with me a month before the debate. It gives a short overview of what went down between Kent Hovind, Robert Sungenis and myself, which led to me finally debating Sungenis. The last part of this is a mirror of a short highlight video NowYouSeeTV did for the debate.
I will be uploading the complete debate shortly. Stay tuned.
Video Source
Technically doesn't the bible say there are 4 corners on the earth stood on pillars (in enoch which is still in the 500yo Ethiopian bible, the oldest known intact bible)
Even if the stars are sentient beings it seems we still need some mechanism to explain their movements other than basically brushing the question off. I have offered a general explanation here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hffevu88I0M Would you give ten minutes to see if any portion of it could help you to better explain them? Thanks.
You worked on satellite dishes, therefore satellites float in space? That's a non-sequitur, Rob. I'm disappointed that you are endorsing the satellite hoax as a legit thing. I thought you were much better informed on this topic than to do something like that.
And that begs the question: by what means do these alleged satellites float in space according to your view? Are you endorsing the gravity myth as well?
It also further begs the question: how come you never do photographic analyses of images of satellites themselves, and also those supposedly from them, as you do with images of the earth? If you start doing that, then it would probably cause you to stop endorsing the satellite hoax immediately, and retract your statements in which you've already done so, such as in this video.
Sungenis is a condescending piece of work. Screw him.
So basically, Professor Fraud challenged a bunch of people to a debate (including Rob)… But they (exclusively Rob), finds/ invents every possible excuse not to debate him. It's like the tortoise refusing to play tennis against the snail..