Discussing Nephilim and the Last Days on The End Time Tribune (5/20/11) FYTube



This was a candid conversation I had with Matthew Miller on his show End Time Tribune back in May of 2011. We spent time discussing Nephilim (including whether or not there was a second incursion), Nimrod, Babylon, the Rapture, Torah and more.

Kinda funny listening to how passionate I was back then about the Firmament as an “ice canopy” before the Flood (taking my cues from Kent Hovind, Carl Baugh and the like). Oh well, live and learn. Always growing and being refined.

The blog (written back in 2011) I refer to in this interview (and in some of the others) can be seen here: http://www.babylonrisingblog.com/

Video Source

27 Comments

  1. Many places in the Scriptures refer to those days as being the "last days" or something that was imminently at had i.e. at the door. How can we then declare we live in the "last days"? We might live in our last days for our time but the time span to Scripture does too much violence to the words to logically conclude what was spoken then applies to our time. yes?

  2. Are they talking in code? I don’t understand what they’re talking about!! Rob usually is easy to understand but I am just not following this. I’m new to all this. Can someone clarify?

  3. Hi
    The languages originated from the confusion of tongues at the Tower of Babel which in turn caused smaller language groups which caused smaller gene pools which caused racial differences. I.E. Japanese people speak Japanese and live in Japan. For some reason, no matter how long white people live in equatorial regions, though, they will NEVER produce dark skinned offspring! Shalom to us only in Christ Yeshua

  4. Excellent question. Very puzzling: Noah's youngest son Ham sins against his father Noah, but it is Ham's son Canaan who Noah curses. Why is that? Follow this thought: Noah's son Ham sinned against his father Noah by uncovering his nakedness. Looking at Lev. 18:6-18 "None of you shall approach any blood relative of his to uncover nakedness; I am the Lord. You shall not "uncover the nakedness of your father, that is the nakedness of your mother". She is your mother; you are not to uncover her nakedness. You shall not uncover the nakedness of your father's wife; it is your father's nakedness". So basically, "uncovering someone's nakedness/seeing someone's nakedness" is a euphemism for having sexual relations, much like "Adam knew his wife Eve" telegraphs that Adam and Eve had sexual relations. Is it possible that Ham saw that his father and mother were drunk in their tent and Ham thought it would be an opportunity to challenge Noah's authority. So he went into the tent and had intercourse with Noah's wife (Ham's mother). Maternal incest. It states in Gen 9:24 that Noah KNEW what his youngest son had done to him. The product of this union was Canaan, whom Noah cursed. Ham had challenged Noah's authority by introducing a competitive seed and producing an illegitimate son. Ham wants to lay claim to the patriarchal line and Noah will have none of it. He points out on several occasions that "Ham is the father of Canaan" and "let Canaan be a servant to Shem and Japheth. So, Noah wants to make sure that everyone in their tribes knows that "Ham is the father of Canaan". Remember that David also slept with Saul's concubines and later Absalom also sleeps with David's concubines to show to the people that he is the new sheriff in town.

Leave a Reply

© 2024 FYTube Online - FYTube.Com

Partners: Omenirea.Ro , masini in rate