In 24 hours EVERYTHING changes for Israel, Putin is Ready – Douglas Macgregor’s Last WARNING FYTube

36 Comments

1. The Jonathan Kleck channel is dropping some hardcore Truth. People better go see it while they still have time ❤🙏

   Log in to Reply

2. The Ukraine-Russia Conflict: A Geopolitical Manipulation Driven by Zionist Interests

   The ongoing war between Ukraine and Russia transcends a mere territorial dispute; it is a complex geopolitical conflict intricately woven into a broader narrative involving Zionist interests and manipulation by powerful elites. This analysis posits that the situation has been engineered to serve specific agendas, particularly those of the military-industrial complex and external political actors.

   Zelensky: The Comedian as a Puppet Leader

   Volodymyr Zelensky, a popular comedian, was groomed by influential Ukrainian Zionist oligarch Igor Kolomoyskyi to become president of Ukraine. Kolomoyskyi, known for his significant media holdings and connections to various sectors, positioned Zelensky as a puppet leader to further his own interests. This connection raises critical questions about Zelensky's legitimacy and qualifications, obscuring the extent to which his presidency reflects the interests of those who placed him in power.

   The Role of Igor Kolomoyskyi and His Business Interests

   Igor Kolomoyskyi is a prominent Ukrainian oligarch whose business dealings encompass banking, media, and energy sectors. His influence extends into the political sphere, and he has been linked to various nefarious activities, including accusations of embezzlement and corruption. Kolomoyskyi's religious affiliation and connections to Zionist agendas suggest that his motivations may align with broader geopolitical strategies. His backing of Zelensky serves to solidify his power and control over Ukrainian resources, positioning him as a key player in the ongoing conflict.

   Victoria Nuland: The Neoconservative Architect

   Victoria Nuland is a notable figure in the neoconservative movement, known for her role in shaping U.S. foreign policy. As a key architect of the 2014 coup in Ukraine, she has been instrumental in advancing an agenda that aligns with the interests of the military-industrial complex and Zionist goals. Nuland's connections to prominent neoconservative figures and organizations, particularly those associated with the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), raise important questions about her motivations.

   The PNAC, founded in 1997, advocates for American global leadership and military interventionism. Many of its founders and supporters, including:

   Donald Rumsfeld: Former Secretary of Defense, played a crucial role in the Iraq War and supported policies favoring Israeli interests. He held dual citizenship in the U.S. and had connections to pro-Israel lobbying groups.

   Dick Cheney: Former Vice President and a significant proponent of the Iraq invasion, Cheney is a key figure in neoconservative circles and has been linked to various lobbying organizations with strong ties to Israel.

   Paul Wolfowitz: Former Deputy Secretary of Defense and a primary architect of the Iraq War, Wolfowitz has consistently advocated for Israeli interests and has connections to Jewish organizations in the U.S.

   Elliott Abrams: A key player in U.S. foreign policy in Latin America and the Middle East, Abrams has dual citizenship and is associated with various neoconservative initiatives supporting Israel.

   These individuals, often characterized by their neoconservative ideology and strong support for Israel, played significant roles in fabricating evidence regarding weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) in Iraq. Their actions contributed to the U.S. invasion of Iraq, purportedly to secure Israel's interests in the region.

   The Crimean Context: A History of Exploitation and Rehabilitation

   Before Russia's annexation of Crimea, the region was plagued by corruption, human trafficking, and organized crime, particularly flourishing under Ukrainian control. The Crimean region was notorious for its unsafe environment, serving as a haven for human traffickers and the sex industry. Since reestablishing Russian control, however, efforts to rehabilitate Crimea have led to significant reductions in these nefarious activities, providing a more stable and secure environment for its residents. This transformation highlights the complexities of governance and control in the region, contrasting the previous state of disarray with a more stable environment under Russian oversight.

   The Military-Industrial Complex and the Prolongation of War

   The West’s decision to supply Ukraine with billions of dollars in military aid has not only prolonged the conflict but also exacerbated human suffering. Rather than pursuing a peace settlement that addresses Russia’s legitimate security concerns, this influx of weapons has perpetuated violence. Critics argue that the military-industrial complex, in collusion with Zionist interests, has played a crucial role in stoking hostilities, benefiting economically from a drawn-out conflict while ignoring the devastating impact on the Ukrainian populace.

   Plan B: A New Order and Resettlement Agenda

   A critical element often overlooked is the concept of a "Plan B"—a strategy that could facilitate a peace settlement between Ukraine and Russia just before Israel instigates a regional conflict with Middle Eastern countries. This would allow for the resettlement of Ukrainian Jews and other Jewish communities into Ukraine as a safe haven while engaging in a broader war. This scenario indicates a calculated move to realign geopolitical power structures, leveraging the chaos of regional conflicts to consolidate control over Ukraine and its resources.

   Population Control and the Elimination of Threats

   A disturbing aspect of this conflict is the strategic depletion of young men of fighting age in Ukraine. As the war grinds on, reports indicate a shift towards recruiting older men and even boys into military service. This tactic not only highlights the desperation of Ukraine's situation but also suggests a systematic effort to eliminate any potential threats. The Azov Battalion, known for its neo-Nazi affiliations, poses a particular challenge for the Zionist agenda, as their removal without direct involvement would be politically damaging. By leveraging Russia to conduct military operations, Zionist interests effectively avoid the moral and legal ramifications of direct action.

   The Zionist Agenda: A Global Strategy for Control

   This conflict can be interpreted as a part of a larger Zionist agenda, aiming to reshape geopolitical landscapes to favor their interests. The theory posits that the West is using the conflict to destabilize Ukraine, allowing for a potential takeover at a fraction of the cost once the dust settles. This strategy aligns with historical notions outlined in the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion," suggesting a systematic approach to global domination through manipulation and control.

   Control Over Agricultural Resources: The Wheat Strategy

   Ukraine’s fertile black soil is critical for global food supply, particularly wheat, which is vital for many Middle Eastern and African nations. The narrative posits that controlling these agricultural resources offers significant leverage over these countries, allowing for price manipulation and geopolitical influence. By destabilizing Ukraine and subsequently acquiring its agricultural assets, external actors can exert control over food supplies, further entrenching their power in the region.

   Conclusion: Actions Speak Louder Than Words

   In summary, the Ukraine-Russia conflict illustrates a complex interplay of manipulation, control, and geopolitical strategy, deeply rooted in historical narratives and modern agendas. From the carefully orchestrated rise of Zelensky, who is closely tied to Zionist oligarchs like Kolomoyskyi, to the broader implications of external involvement in the region, including the potential for a peace settlement to facilitate a resettlement agenda, it is evident that this conflict serves as a stage for larger powers to pursue their objectives without directly engaging in the bloodshed. As the saying goes, “Actions speak louder than words,” reminding us to scrutinize the underlying motivations and consequences of the actions taken by those in power.

   Log in to Reply

3. Why do people play victim after they poke the bear…

   Log in to Reply

4. So Israel is just supposed to sit back, get attacked unprovoked and not do anything about it?

   Log in to Reply

5. All wars are bankers wars

   Log in to Reply