Joe Rogan and Arian Foster discuss the feedback Arian got after he said he could kill a wolf 1 on 1.
Taken from Joe Rogan Experience #928
Video Source
46 Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Joe Rogan and Arian Foster discuss the feedback Arian got after he said he could kill a wolf 1 on 1.
Taken from Joe Rogan Experience #928
Video Source
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I killed a wolf with a deer bone, I haven’t went hiking since. I have major scaring on my back and leg, I drove myself to the hospital. I needed around 70 stitches because I was being attacked by a pack. Their teeth are sharp but once their alpha is dead the rest run. I know from experience
Arian seems like a hella cool dude! But he's out of his freakin' mind if he thinks even had a prayer of a chance against a wolf, lol! =)
I have my thoughts on this. I feel like a human is stronger than a wolf one hundred percent. We CAN lift hundreds of pounds of the floor with relative ease, if you're not a coach potato. What makes humans weak isn't our physical body, but it's our mindset. We don't the capacity to be ferocious animals anymore, I mean we live in a time of degeneracy, men aren't men anymore sadly. I've pulled big dogs towards me with just my arm strength since I'm a relatively strong person. Their bite though, it's intense, but if I'm fighting a wolf to protect my family, it's done. Humans underestimate human strength and our capacity to be ferocious WAY TO MUCH ITS EMBARASSING.
We can punch, kick, grapple, bite, eye gouge, throw, and we have intelligence and endurance (unsure about endurance, I've heard from a lot of sources that humans have the most endurance)
Wolf has speed, biting, thicker skin That's it
Now, 2 wolves, you're dead doesn't matter, you'll die.
Hmm. I have done a little bit of research and have come to the conclusion that this man would kill a wolf in a fight, and likely without even sustaining near fatal injury. The main arguments for this include: Humans have much stronger limbs than wolves. Humans have much more flexible and dexterous limbs than wolves. Humans have much better attack strategy and balance than wolves. The main arguments against this include: Wolves have much stronger bites than humans, and have attack instinct and hunting practice. However, in my opinion, this disregards many aspects of the fight. Firstly, the premise disregards if the human is attacking the wolf of if the wolf is attacking the human. It is a well known fact that animals are quite scared of humans, even apex predators like wolves, so they are unlikely to attack. If a human attacked a wolf, and the wolf was even slightly not ready for the attack, the human would easily wrap a limb around the wolf's neck, and choke it to death. Even if the wolf was fully ready, it is built for attack, not defense. It would bite for one of the humans limbs, and latch on. This would not incapacitate the human. The human would use the wolf's distraction, and either latch on to its neck and choke it, or kick it in the ribs, or (other places). This would either lead to the wolf at the very least being unconscious from the choke, or sustaining serious damage from the kicks. The wolf is once again not build for defense, so the wolf would likely momentarily back down after the human's attack, allowing the human the attack prerogative. The human would then do one of two things: Unleash a series of brutal limb (kicks, punches, elbows, knees, etc.) attacks and eventually beat the wolf to death, or choke the wolf to unconsciousness or death. Even if the wolf got a solid bite on a limb, this would prove deadly for the wolf, as it would not disable a human on adrenaline, and the human would beat or choke it. Additionally, the wolfs main chance, attacking the neck or vital organs, could easily be countered by the much more intelligent human.
A wolf would eat him