48 Comments

  1. Surely it simply about choice. Allowing trans women to compete against sys women removes the latters choice over who they compete against. Why don't all sports just have 3 categories: X, Y and mixed? Then noone has to compete against someone they feel has a genetic advantage unless they want to.

  2. Joe is very much in the middle with his take, but people on both sides will think he's anti-trans. you can see it in the comments. the left claiming joe is anti-trans and the right being anti-trans. the only problem in transgenderism is whether one has unfair advantage over the other and whether that should be allowed. joe is very much pro trans in terms of letting people be what they want as long as it doesn't hurt anyone. most liberals would agree with joe unlike popular believe that the right seems to be spreading. they seems to only see the extreme radical liberals representing the entire left (similar logic would be left thinking the right as white supremist).

    if we want to stop this political division we should stop nutpicking and stop this nonsense of "if i speak up about it i will be cancelled". despite some jewish dude claims (dude litearlly makes money off of this public discourse of course he's going to stir up crazy rhetoric).

  3. it’s the same in chess.. not a single one of the top 10 female players could finish in the to 20 in a tournament with those 10 women and the top 40 men and the women know it so they will not play in open tournaments for anyone.. judit polgar was the exception in the 90s, all she played in was open tournies and she got as high as #6 in the world… no other woman has done it

Leave a Reply

© 2024 FYTube Online - FYTube.Com

Partners: Omenirea.Ro , masini in rate