Joe Rogan and Adam Frank on the political polarization of science.
Video Source
20 Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Joe Rogan and Adam Frank on the political polarization of science.
Video Source
You must be logged in to post a comment.
It’s just funny the guy keeps saying climate change denieries don’t get that EVERY civilization that reaches this point causes climate change…(there is less proof to support that then There is proof to support the moon is there)
Secondly he says you can’t call one branch of science a hoax because people will question other branches. That is the same argument when people say “ yeah it’s bad that it’s happening but if we change it we will have to change it for everyone” 🤡🤦♂️. Sound like you better change it for everyone then. That’s one of the dumbest things I’ve heard. IF YOU SEE INJUSTICE/ WRONG DOING call it out. If the branch of science seems full of crap
And Literaly gets paid to produce nothing, getting tenure lll(good for the scientist)…then call it out. String theory ? 😂😂😂😂 nvm. If you know you.
it is government that is holding everything back. It's called freedom to create. If we had a true free market we would've already moved to way more advanced green technology. Also the debate is about is it man made or is it the sun's and the Earth's vibrational energies that go through warm and cool periods.
Yet Joe is always making science political
Joe needs to develop more skepticism in science. Humanity has big hubris. Science is beyond honest natural discovery. Science is most definitely paid for by interested parties at the policy front. Climate science in particular is a nasty business enterprise. Climate has been the opiate of religion since ever since. Scientist are humans and making money. I am an Environmental Scientist and I encourage you to be skeptical about the religion of science. Dig deeper JRE.
The truth is no one knows what the hell is going on. If a rainstorm or snowstorm cant be accurately predicted 5 days out how the hell are these people going to predict changes to the global climate?
Solar radiation, solar flares, distance from the sun, angle relative to the sun, solar winds, magnetosphere, ionosphere, plant growth sequestering CO2, humans releasing CO2 and other industrial gases, volcanic activity, geothermal activity, and on and on and on.
Add to this the Earth is loaded with homeostatic mechanisms… warmer temperature = longer growing season = more CO2 sequestered by plants, etc….
There is no way human models are accounting for the complexity of these systems. The truth is, if anyone tells you they know what is going on with the climate, they are lying to you and probably themselves as well.