He was not "definitely down for ten". He was not down at the count of ten (which is what matters), and he was down for LESS THAN TEN SECONDS for those who think that the count was slow. Fury would have beaten a count that was accurate beyond all human abilities. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvkwOaGhtXg&t=26s
From when Fury’s back hit the canvas, the moment he’s on his both feet with nothing else touching the ground, it was still 9 seconds. So Fury did beat the 10 count, by less than one second. And should have won the decision…
He was not "definitely down for ten". He was not down at the count of ten (which is what matters), and he was down for LESS THAN TEN SECONDS for those who think that the count was slow. Fury would have beaten a count that was accurate beyond all human abilities. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvkwOaGhtXg&t=26s
the ref didn’t start the count until he was down for a full second, and then he didn’t get up fully for 12 seconds.
all these comments about a 10 count… no 10 count is 13 seconds long 😂
From when Fury’s back hit the canvas, the moment he’s on his both feet with nothing else touching the ground, it was still 9 seconds.
So Fury did beat the 10 count, by less than one second.
And should have won the decision…
I've heard about long counts so many times. The only thing that matters is the referee's count and his fingers in the guys face.
10 equals 20 in terms of boxing