Taken from JRE #1214: https://youtu.be/Igc_1TPfK9Y
Video Source
48 Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Taken from JRE #1214: https://youtu.be/Igc_1TPfK9Y
Video Source
You must be logged in to post a comment.
The man actually was making the argument that if someone took a gun and did something inappropriate with it after listening to a charged 'news' commentary than there is a problem. If someone incites violence they should be prosecuted. If during the course of someones politically charged rant an individual decides its proper to commit a horrible crime than charge the individual for the act they took. This reasoning is exactly the same when it comes to rape victims and the circumstances surrounding their particular assault. No, what you were wearing or doing at the time does not provide a defence for the rapist. However, high risk behaviour is just that, high risk. The potentiality of something bad happening absolutely increases with higher risk activity. The rapists is always responsible in the end for their actions. Folks like Alex Jones may engage in high risk behaviour but he is no more responsible for the actions of a listener than the rape victim is responsible for the action of their abuser.
Complete fucking straw man arguments.
The comments in this thread, is literally killing me with it's stupidity!
Well gee, if only we HAD laws in this country, instead of this honor system that only half the country is honoring.
This dude is delusional… He blames A.I. for liberal biase?? What a fool!!