In that the 7/31/2020 pyropulse reply… i.e. "Energy is never a substance"… to the above qslingo comment has been deleted, and RE Clips restrictions do not facilitate a reply of length as necessary to coherently offer alternative didacticisms, I have posted my reply to pyropuse as an addendum to the UQS Social Media and Forum Log at http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQSSMF.php... text search pyropulse.
I also e-mailed pyropulse a copy of full discussion, the UQS Social Media and Forum Log link.
Is Zero Point Energy (ZPE) a reference to "Energy" as phenomena or "Energy" as a substance?
In that the "Next Generation" is here now, and the Physics and Metaphysics communities are currently entangled in the chaos of a terminology duplicity dysfunction that is prohibiting the perceptual unification required to tap the potential of Quantum Energy Mechanix… e.g. the long promised Star Trek Replicator, Self Healing, and Social Stabilty,… inherent within the field we are immersed, is it possible that proponents of each mindset implement a common catagorical subdivision of the Directory Root: ENERGY… e.g. ENERGY/PHENOMENA and ENERGY/SUBSTANCE.
For a more explicit justification of requested terminology revision, and methodology to achieve perceptual unification, see Space-Time Energy As Substance Underlies All Space-Time Energy Phenomena at: http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQSETermDys.php
In that the 7/31/2020 pyropulse reply… i.e. "Energy is never a substance"… to the above qslingo comment has been deleted, and RE Clips restrictions do not facilitate a reply of length as necessary to coherently offer alternative didacticisms, I have posted my reply to pyropuse as an addendum to the UQS Social Media and Forum Log at http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQSSMF.php... text search pyropulse.
I also e-mailed pyropulse a copy of full discussion, the UQS Social Media and Forum Log link.
S. Lingo
UQSMatrixMechanix.com
You need to get Eddie bravo on to explain quantum physics
WOO-Tang
Is Zero Point Energy (ZPE) a reference to "Energy" as phenomena or "Energy" as a substance?
In that the "Next Generation" is here now, and the Physics and Metaphysics communities are currently entangled in the chaos of a terminology duplicity dysfunction that is prohibiting the perceptual unification required to tap the potential of Quantum Energy Mechanix… e.g. the long promised Star Trek Replicator, Self Healing, and Social Stabilty,… inherent within the field we are immersed, is it possible that proponents of each mindset implement a common catagorical subdivision of the Directory Root: ENERGY… e.g. ENERGY/PHENOMENA and ENERGY/SUBSTANCE.
For a more explicit justification of requested terminology revision, and methodology to achieve perceptual unification, see Space-Time Energy As Substance Underlies All Space-Time Energy Phenomena at: http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQSETermDys.php
yes