the sokal affiar was way back in the 90s. This is at least 30 years in the making. More than that if you look into soviet/cold-war stuff. Tax payer subsidies on universities are over due for cutting.
They let people know before hand what they were doing. Then on top of it if the professors were wrong and the process actually did what was suppose to do these "fabricated" papers would never had been published and this whole experiment would have been stopped. But because there is corruption, which is obviously shown with plenty of proof, the board is mad at them for clearly showing a problem and are mad at them. Then if they punish them the school will lose money because who will want to send their kid to that school?
I study economics and genderstudies is already creeping it's way into our masters disertations. Hopefully the ones who are doing a study one the topic posit rational findings that challenge the confirmation bias. Ask difficult questions surrounding possible "solutions" such as quotas and other so called well intended, but clearly misguided and shortsighted, solutions. However the topic attracts female students more, who stand to gain more from confirming the BS rather than to challenge it.
I hate how smacky his mouth it's when he talks
the sokal affiar was way back in the 90s. This is at least 30 years in the making. More than that if you look into soviet/cold-war stuff. Tax payer subsidies on universities are over due for cutting.
They let people know before hand what they were doing. Then on top of it if the professors were wrong and the process actually did what was suppose to do these "fabricated" papers would never had been published and this whole experiment would have been stopped. But because there is corruption, which is obviously shown with plenty of proof, the board is mad at them for clearly showing a problem and are mad at them. Then if they punish them the school will lose money because who will want to send their kid to that school?
Lol It is Portland State. They don't have common sense. The guy is going to get the boot
I study economics and genderstudies is already creeping it's way into our masters disertations. Hopefully the ones who are doing a study one the topic posit rational findings that challenge the confirmation bias. Ask difficult questions surrounding possible "solutions" such as quotas and other so called well intended, but clearly misguided and shortsighted, solutions.
However the topic attracts female students more, who stand to gain more from confirming the BS rather than to challenge it.