49 Comments

  1. Somebody tell this turd the technology to go to the moon didn't exist at the time either. So if you look at it that way the question is: what's easier, developing tech ti go to the moon or fake go to the moon?

  2. This Adam dude isn't giving any legit points to back his hypothesis. If US wanted to fake it by fake films they could have done it. Have you ever watched the so called 6 hour long telecast? Is there any recorded videos on that anywhere?

  3. That is a ridiculous proposition even if Landing on the Moon was relatively easy. However faking the Moon Landings would have been child's play especially if the intention was to go, but it was later discovered to be impossible or far more difficult than at first thought. Also, NASA did not even do a good job at faking it, they did a terrible one. Not bad for the time but something that simply can't hold up to later-day scrutiny. The US military has speculated many billions on all kinds of projects which came to nothing however this particular failure was too geo-political to be simply abandoned.

    Having said the above, this does not mean that Man has not been to the Moon, just that he did not go then, using the method described. For all we know NASA could have been countless times since, maybe they are there now? I doubt it simply because I can't personally understand why Man would want to do so, as there is no benefit or money to be gained. However, there is plenty to be gained by continuing to pretend to have gone there and by promising to go there again in the future.

    NASA has a large budget that pays a lot of highly-paid scientists to develop all kinds of things most of which have nothing to do with space exploration.

Leave a Reply

© 2024 FYTube Online - FYTube.Com

Partners: Omenirea.Ro , masini in rate