The lack of privacy amongst those under the age of 25 will come back to haunt them if our phony "paragon of virtue" political standards endure for a couple more decades. Think the dredging up of misdeeds of a candidate's past is bad now? Wait 30 years until some cabinet secretary nominee, known online today as muffdestroyer69, is sitting at a Senate confirmation hearing. Some YouTube archivist comes in with a hard drive and runs the guys entire online history? Either all our politicians in the 2050s will be Amish, or they will have to be completely shameless.
The lack of privacy amongst those under the age of 25 will come back to haunt them if our phony "paragon of virtue" political standards endure for a couple more decades. Think the dredging up of misdeeds of a candidate's past is bad now? Wait 30 years until some cabinet secretary nominee, known online today as muffdestroyer69, is sitting at a Senate confirmation hearing. Some YouTube archivist comes in with a hard drive and runs the guys entire online history? Either all our politicians in the 2050s will be Amish, or they will have to be completely shameless.
That's just stupid argument.
Joe Big Bro Rogan
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
The USSR would have been envious of the ease and willingness with which we give up our individual rights to privacy