42 Comments

  3. I saw something disappear in front of my eyes one time. I have questions. I was also born the day the lockerbie bombing happened… Its also the Nostradamus/Mayan date. Im 31. It was late october 2011 and then 3 weeks later I saw this. I know what I saw twice. It was was certainly an unidentified flying object that moved and disappeared/faded/got smaller till I couldn't see it…

    I think something is out there.

  4. You being respectful and kind to scientists is what makes your show awesome, with the exception of how you treated Nick Bostrom who was trying to explain the most simple aspect of probability theory to you joe and you acted as if he were wrong and that you knew more about the math behind the simulation argument than Nicholas Bostrom did himself, the guy who actually came up with the theory. You kept sayibg over and over but yea what if the simulation theory hasn't been created yet and its something we will create in the future. The math, (which is not very complex by the way) suggests pretty clearly that if we or any other intelligence in this or any other reality can one day create simulations that you joe can not in any why what so ever discern from base reality, and any civilization choses to run simulations, than in turn eventually a number of their simulated realities would choose themselves to create simulations, than due to there being literally billions or more simulations being carried out that were indistinguishable from base reality , than the probability that we live in base reality or ever lived in bade reality would literally be one in one in many billions. The one represents base reality, as there is only one base reality in the billions or more of simuations, it doesnt matter where that one was on a timeline because those living in their realities would have no way of accessing this data anyway, then the chances that we are in base reality is not at all effected by wither or not our civilization could be the first to create a simulation or not due to everyone in every reality thats simulated also thinking their realities are base realities and maybe one day they will themselces be able to create a simulation, having zero knowledfe of they themselves being a simulated reality. You kinda called bullshit on nick bostrom which i couldn't believe m when you said tye same thing to Elon Musk " yea but what if our reality is base and we just are not capable of creating simulations yet but one day we will. ELON smirked and laughed knowing the odds we live in base reality and we just have not created simulations yet but one day we probably will, as being insanely low odds. Elon just really really liked you joe, you could tell and he just didnt want to call out bullshit and hurt your feelings, plus I think he thought you were very scared of the idea of our reality being simulationed so he didnt want to upset you because like aI said he really liked you. You pulled your bullshit meter out on a genius level intellect qnd started call8ng bullshit and repeating yourself 100 times, when the math was literally against your stance by over a billion to one can you imagine those odds in vegas. Nick bostrom is not just a genius but also the man who came up with tje simulationing argument, so i think he kniws the subject matter pretty damn well. It is not like you to argue with a genius level scientist or expert, especially in tgeir field if expertise. You just kept repeating yourself "yea but what of we live in base reality and we just haven't come up with simulations yet but one day we will" You were attacking him over and over with zero facts on your side, and in doinf so you made it look like you do not understand the most rudimentary level probability theory because Joe the numbers were well over a billion to one against you! How you treat scientists and academics is why your show is so amazing! Seeimg you attack Nick Bostroms position over and over with no evidence other than you really really really, did not want his position to he true. Just because you want something to be the trilyth joe does not make it so. Nick Bostrom was so damn kind, and patient in trying to explain the simple probabilities and simple math behind the simulation argument to you, you should have been appreciative he tried so hard to explain something that really is not to complex to you. Instead you kept attacking him and questioning him, basically calling out bullshit on bostrom because you wete either to scared to entertain the mathimatics behind what he was saying, maybe you just want this to be vase reality REALLY REALLY BAD, and maybe you were gettimg frustrated because you just could not understand the very basic probability theory that makes up the simulation argument. This shocked me because I too thought you to be very smart, especially when compared to the average American. I have always thought your ability to see what is truth and what is bullshit also very good. With that said nick bostrom is not some conspiracy theorist! He is a brilliant scientist and philosophier. You really owe him an apology because he was n8ce enough to come on your show. I have never seem you act like that joe especially toward a scientist or someonw of genius level intelligence, I hope I never see you act like that again because acting in that manner will completely ruin your Amazing show

  5. I'll be honest Joe, I believe lazar.
    But you really should not have had Jeremy Corbel on the podcast at the same time. Could also totally tell you were done with his dumb ass ramblings 😂😂

Leave a Reply

© 2024 FYTube Online - FYTube.Com

Partners: Omenirea.Ro , masini in rate