36 Comments

  1. You guys have to understand that "why" where we are is useless. Even if we were to entertain a novel thought asserting "the curve of space-time is the curve of God's head" or something like that forward you would keep asking "why is that?". It's a uselessness of mentally getting back to Earth and using the knowing of "how". There will never be a complete or total philosophical boundary where a thought can't say "that's well but why?". With time you have to accept a limit of influence of your environment but work things out where you are there. Really not all questions have an answer where meaning is not broken down entirely that this of abstraction is not solvable but is a communication of expression branded as solvable. In other words things may be pretended as a question but adapted as an expression.

    Edit: I think NDT was trying to help Joe here where Joe's desire or lack of fulfillment comes of a lack of proper stimuli before this interview causing him to wish for "organized chaos", of context, that will help him maintain his dream of higher power. NDT referencing Joe's bald head appeared as method to incite Joe to recognize to move on productively, in a way he can be of service later but cohesively act now where Joe was increasingly in his own way of perceiving things which may turn dangerous.

    Edit 2: I want to keep going. There's so much sneakiness through 'temporal fallacy' here. Joe tried to claim he was inquiring of a thought like of some "container" around "gravitons" or whatever giving balance to gravity, of alignment to the mechanical logic of the universe, but he wasn't that he lied. He definitely was not inquiring of the current frontier of mechanical scientific discovery where he wanted to EXPLICITLY posit ideas of meaning and purpose but challenging NDTs critique of subjects with philosophy. In part I think Joe did that in response of Neil calling him bald as that can be disrespect but Joe saying Neil is seemingly defensive about science like Neil was operating shamefully is ridiculous. Where we are at now there are times it's best to be defensive about scientific actuality. A lot of spiritual types, religious types, and conspiracy types are seeking to manipulate perception to discredit essential authorities as an opportunity to influence communities for their own benefit and control legislation around these "alternative" subjects like we're supposed to be converted by them. Science is stopping this of it's own and not if people think science isn't with authority.

Leave a Reply

© 2024 FYTube Online - FYTube.Com

Partners: Omenirea.Ro , masini in rate