Taken from JRE #1347: Neil deGrasse Tyson: https://youtu.be/0pmviUS1Zac
Video Source
36 Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Taken from JRE #1347: Neil deGrasse Tyson: https://youtu.be/0pmviUS1Zac
Video Source
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Who's here after Terrence Howard 2024
It neither answers why nor how. It describes the events that we observe. You can’t prove that there are any relations between the events. Sience observes it doesn’t answer why nor how. It is prediction.
NDT keeps claiming that wanting to understand how gravity actually works on a fundamental level, is a why question. But it's not. It's not philosophical to want to understand the fundamental mechanics of gravity. The curvature of spacetime understanding falls apart in the world of quantum mechanics, and the field theory of gravity only works if the graviton actually exists (which is currently unprovable), so the question Joe is asking is still a how question. No matter how much Neil tries to make it seem like a why question. How does gravity work on a fundamental level? and the answer is still, "we don't know." And it's strange to me just how much he pushes back against that simple question, as if it's a heretical thing to ask, when science is supposed to be all about the how.
Would earth still have gravity if it was not moving?
Did you ever notice that the force of gravity is the same as the expanding universe. Do you know why ?