31 Comments

  1. And he, James, talks over Chris all the time. Chris is trying to make a nuanced argument, James is like, here I proved some cattle get some b-12 so my argument is true in summa. No, the real argument or question should be, how much, how often, and to what affect. James leads the viewer to believe it's all cattle, all the time, and that is the only b12 you get from meat, exogenous.

  2. Funny how bias works. Funny how someone skilled in argument can overcome a poor argument. Example, James: "it doesn't matter if you're vegan or not cattle are getting B-12 supplements". Chris: "there is 0 evidence this is the case". James; "here is evidence of cattle b-12 supplements, I WIN". But the deeper question is, what % of cattle that makes it to your plate given B-12, when were they given it, why were they given it, and how long were they on it? How much of the B-12 in the meat that you consume is derived from these supplements? So in the strictest sense yes he won, there is evidence that cattle are given b-12 supplements, but he showed no evidence of wide spread use, or that the b-12 given even makes it to the dinner plate. I raise cattle, very small, a couple at a time. I just use a salt supplement and grass, have had no health issues with my cattle.

Leave a Reply

© 2024 FYTube Online - FYTube.Com

Partners: Omenirea.Ro , masini in rate