Taken from JRE #1393 w/Chris Kresser and James Wilks:
https://youtu.be/s0zgNY_kqlI
Video Source
49 Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Taken from JRE #1393 w/Chris Kresser and James Wilks:
https://youtu.be/s0zgNY_kqlI
Video Source
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I thought James came across bad on TUF, but he's actually much worse here. Joe's a bozo for not pulling him up
There's no standard definition for low carb diets. Measuring diets by percentages of macronutrients alone is extremely misleading because you can have a diet that is 40% of calories from carbohydrates but if most of those carbohydrates are coming from non starchy vegetables the volume of the diet could be 80%+ vegetables. That's completely different to a diet that's 40% calories from carbohydrates in sugar and junk food.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-carbohydrate_diet
James is just character associating and not answering any actual facts, typical hyper biased argument tactic, attack the person cause you cant defend your position.
So why does this expert of Wilks don't talk himself? Why is the non-expert Wilks there instead of him?
We all see what "scientists" recommended all the time. Today one thing is bad, then good again. Round and round it goes.
It is not mathematics.
It is totally valid to define the carbohydrate intake as low, medium and so on, as long as he sticks with it.
These definitions change al the time anyway.
The recommendations how much nutrion we need, how much protein, vitamins and so on are made up. They change regularily, so how can they not be made up. The argument of James is bullshit.
Like the protein and quality. He never talked about the amino acid composition. Just eat your slice of bread to get 5 g of protein. Great, but how much of it can we actually use? Not every plant has all the essential amino acids in the same amount.