Taken from JRE #1393 w/Chris Kresser and James Wilks:
https://youtu.be/s0zgNY_kqlI
Video Source
30 Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Taken from JRE #1393 w/Chris Kresser and James Wilks:
https://youtu.be/s0zgNY_kqlI
Video Source
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Might go vegan after this. Blue shirt is tripping bad
he lied about dairy and inflamation,, at the end (he said no thats a lie),, why the fuck is he defending dairy (oh i guess other video i just watched of him already shown how wrong that fucker is he lies so much so far
dairy is without a doubt 100% creating inflamation in almost everyhuman who consumes juste different levels of inflamation depeneding on many factors,, but absolutely everyone reacts to it,,, just differently at different levels depending on dna genetic environment excercise,, you know the who shabang,,
woaw even the study itself is biased (they used the wording no evidence instead of showed uncertainty,, so unless they only took the bad study?
-i guess the whole confusion is the 71% wtf does that even mean,, showed no evidence
showed no evidence of a statistically significant association,, LIKE WTF THAT even means? (did they just put all the small insignificant increase of cancer risks in the same bundle ,,, like 1000 people with cancer risks increase of only like 5 to 10% increase in cancer? in the same bundle of that 71% so that their studie wouldnt look so bad
i listen to so many vegan scientists explaining in detail how they corrupt the studies IN CRAZY BRILLIANtly AMAZING WAYs,, i wouldnt even be surprised if there was something shady just in those wording (even the increase and decrease (like oh you decrease risk of cancer was only 1 2 5 %crazy tiny ,, OH BUT IT COUNTS LETS PUT THAT IN THAT bundle of 13% (while the other increase cancers
while maybe if i exagerate even more,, that the 16% maybe it was like 50% 70% of their cancer was JUST FROM THE DAIRY Alone increase of cancer (ofc im exagerating i have no idea actualy cancer increase % from many different lifestyle,, but they wont give that % of how much dairy impacted their cancer vs other lifestyle and they just put them in THAT CATegory of increase
3 categories they put all these people in (HOW DID THEY CHOOSE WHO TO PUT IN WHAT CAtegory) what % of cancer must be because of dairy alone to be considered in witch category,,,
insignificant that 71% (maybe they put as much as the increase chances % 5 10 15 20% that they could cramp up in that 71% insignificant),,, while decrease cheating with the 1 2 or 5% was from dairy alone and yet they didnt put into insignificant but in decreased risks)
they made the fkin study for fuck sake and they always do things shady similar to that (always takes some vegan doctor to go in deep or some anty (that study to go in deep to debunk it,, else people just eat it up,, bit like myself,, im obviously vegan biased,, but in my experience crazy easier to be biased on animal fats then on wfpb sober