Here’s just a short, little clip wherein I’ve elaborated on some of the things I discussed in the last show I did with Zen, dealing with the shrinking mill on Lake Erie and how it relates to atmospheric lensing and magnification.
Video Source
44 Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
19:1 The firmament showith the Lords handy work.
That’s what I think about every time I’m reminded the earth is flat. Behold the glory of God. AMEN.
Thank you for sharing that brother Rob. Supports what I think I know lol. But what you said at the end; they don’t realize what they’re showing us, some call that soft disclosure. Others call it hiding truth in plain sight. Big Bear says it’s just in plain sight. Hopefully this will spread like the ***-19
To quantify the Willis Tower 'research'' and prove any quanitfiable lensing (or stretching of vision in the horizontal plane) as Rob Skiba is trying to imply (I think thats the suggestion??), you need to quantify the distances. Using zoomed cars, and guess-worked sized boat and diatances is never going to prove anything, especially given that any lensing is miniscule and, I suggest most prominant in the verticle plane, since this is the plane in which the layering is causing the changes in comparative air density.
However, you can easily create a quantifiable test to measure the 'stretching' that you are looking for, if in fact, it is happening at all:
We know the distance to the tower and the distance to the rocks.
We also know the width of the building so we can calculate a distance whichb should represent the building and mark it on the rocks. This would be very easy to do.
If the calculated width at the rocks appears to be significantly smaller than the width of the tower, then we know that there is significant lensing taking place.
I dont live in the US but I would happily perform the calculations and let someone who lives there go out and test it.
Any takers?
I'm pretty sure this is an optical illusion….the mill stays the same size (I kept a ruler on it)……it looks like it is getting smaller because it is so far away it isn't going to change size relative to the cameras small amount of forward movement, but the framing of the mill by the road and trees gets larger as the camera gets closer…that framing of road and trees creates a window that we are looking through….when we are farther from the turn in the road that "frame" is small and the whole mill is in the opening….as we get closer that "frame" gets larger and the mill takes up less of that "frame" which makes it look like its getting smaller….in actuality, the mill is staying the same size but the "frame" of trees and road is opening larger!
God Bless and keep up that Quest for Truth!!!
You mentioned that you took both pictures with the same camera and then later at the end you said you took the chicago picture with your iphone. how do you mean?