29 Comments

  1. (Un)fortunately, the 1st Amendment doesn't support Trump here, because he's still free to speak his lies. Even tho he has no evidence to present to any court, he can continue to claim the democracy has been defrauded. No-one owes him extra online megaphones on top of that.

  2. False equivalence. The government already regulates speech to some degree, and the argument isn't about regulating speech. The argument is how much of a market share does a company need to have before they can be regulated under monopoly laws, and can a private company use it's influence to deny the public common access to a public figure?

    Think of it this way. AT&T was a private telephone company for a long time, but at no point could they deny ppl from calling up their senators office. Twitter is basically the same thing, and forcing a phone company to access public figures and ppl is regulating the company, not speech.

    So I don't understand where this guy is coming from, or if he understands the topic he's talking about.

Leave a Reply

© 2024 FYTube Online - FYTube.Com

Partners: Omenirea.Ro , masini in rate