What is GOD Like? – This Fact About God Is Seen In The First Page Of The Bible FYTube

31 Comments

1. Don't any of you know what Gods like, so it seems. You think you know giving all your self opinions, saying so you think, all these marvelous things about God. Thinking that its going to win you victory, and heavenly salvation. You seems to think you know the good conditions of God. What about the bad. You humans hasn't got a small clue. And if any of you ever saw God, without Gods permission, the scenery would kill you instantly. I have checked, and with proof the only one that knows what God is, and like, and what God looks like. I ask does anybody else know this.

   Log in to Reply

2. God is my Father always there when need him try my best live right read my Bible everyday might not do what he wants me but avoid things not of him. At this moment listening to some gospel music and watching this I love God so much he is so good. I want to keep my faith strong until go to my heavenly home where there is no pain … no sorrow just praise and shout up there, not sure how long have on this earth hope when expire get a chance to make it up there. No matter what we go through just wait patient on him he is your Father every night say my prayers pray for all my brothers and sisters the enemy is destroying this world we all his children most people might act funny or turn their back on me still going love them be there if need something.

   Log in to Reply

3. If God really is so great,i cannot understand why he allows Ukrainian atrocities when killing Putin is easy way out. Why does God not care about what happens to people on earth? I see no evidence of God being in control. Too many Christians are unnecessarily being killed for Faith. Given that reality I don't see why I would stick my head out of the crowd to preach and get in trouble.maybe God weeps over the Ukraine but why doesn't he take action, when it's so easy for him to do.

   Log in to Reply

4. Thank You Father For Your Grace….🙏🏿❤️❤️❤️❤️

   Log in to Reply

5. "When we say…Jesus Christ…was produced without sexual union, and was crucified and died, and rose again, and ascended to heaven, **we propound nothing new or different** from what you believe regarding those whom you call Sons of God. [In fact]…if anybody objects that [Jesus] was crucified, this is in **common** with the sons of Zeus (as you call them) who suffered, as previously listed [he listed Dionysus, Hercules, and Asclepius]. Since their fatal sufferings are all narrated as not similar but different, so his unique passion should not seem to be any worse."

   Note how Justin (Martyr) is less of a fool than modern Christian apologists. He admits that differences don’t matter. Since each and every one of the suffering and dying gods are slain by different means, one cannot argue the mytheme requires exactly the same means of death. “But Osiris can’t have inspired the Jesus myth because Osiris wasn’t nailed to a cross” is a stupid argument. The mytheme is simply death. Being killed. Suffering and dying. The exact mode of death can vary freely. It makes no difference to the existence and influence of the mytheme. It’s simply the particular instantiation of a generic abstraction. And Justin’s argument (that Satan invented these fake religions to confuse people) entails Justin agreed the mytheme existed: indeed, it was demonically promulgated, multiple times. Intentionally.

   Likewise, Justin notices the mytheme is not virgin birth, but sexless conception. Of which many examples had already been popularized in pagan mythology (there just happens to also have been examples of actual virgin born gods as well). And by his argument (that the Devil was deliberately emulating the Jesus mytheme, in advance), Justin clearly accepted the same principle for “rising again” after death: the particular exact metaphysics of the resurrection could, like the exact method of death or conception, vary freely. The mytheme consists solely of the abstraction: returning to life. Somehow. Some way. We will say bodily, at the very least. But what sort of body (the same one, a new one, a mortal one, an immortal one), didn’t matter. If it had, Justin would have made the argument that “those gods” weren’t really resurrected. But that argument, never occurs to him. Nor did it to any other apologist of the first three centuries.

   Ancient Christians well knew there was nothing new about their dying-and-rising god. Not in respect to the mytheme. Their claims were solely that his particular instantiation of it was better, and the only one that actually happened. They didn’t make up the stupid modern arguments that dying-and-rising god myths didn’t exist or weren’t part of a common mytheme everyone knew about. For example, in the same century, Tertullian, in Prescription against Heretics 40, makes exactly the same argument as Justin. Funny that. They had better access to the evidence than we do. They knew what was really and widely the case. We should listen to them.

   Google "Dying-and-Rising Gods: It's Pagan, Guys. Get Over It. • Richard Carrier"

   ——————————————————————

   Google "Ehrman Errs: Yes, Bart, There Were Dying & Rising Gods – atheologica"

   Watch "Dying & Rising Gods: A Response to William Lane Craig" by Derreck Bennett at Atheologica.

   Google "The First Easters: Death and Resurrection Before Christ | atheologica"

   Google "The Christs Before Christ: Tammuz-Adonis | atheologica"

   Watch "Asclepius: The Pre-Christian Healer & Savior" by Derreck Bennett at Atheologica

   Google "Virgin Birth: It's Pagan, Guys. Get Over It. • Richard Carrier"

   Google "5 Pagan Parallels to Jesus That Actually Aren’t Bullshit – Atheomedy"

   Google "Christian Apologetics: The Art of Deceit – Atheomedy"

   Google "Isaiah 53 & the Suffering Servant | atheologica"

   Google "Defending the Resurrection: It’s Easy if You Lie! – Atheomedy"

   Google "Rising Gods, Pagan Parallels, and Cultural Context: A Response to M. David Litwa | atheologica"

   Google "An Evidence Attested Resurrection? – chromosome two"

   Google "The Empty Tomb: A Rhetorical Dead End – atheologica"

   Google "Theological Dodgeball: On the Posturing of Faith over Reason | atheologica"

   Google "Majority of Scholars agree: The Gospels were not written by Eyewitnesses – Escaping Christian Fundamentalism"

   A good site written by an actual Biblical scholar.

   Google "Contradictions in the Bible | Identified verse by verse and explained using the most up-to-date scholarly information about the Bible, its texts, and the men who wrote them — by Dr. Steven DiMattei"

   Google "How do we know that the biblical writers were **not** writing history? — by Dr Steven DiMattei"

   Also:

   Google "How Did The Gospel Writers Know? – The Doston Jones Blog"

   Google "Yes, the Four Gospels Were Originally Anonymous: Part 1 – The Doston Jones Blog"

   Google "Are Stories in the Bible Influenced by Popular Greco-Roman Literature? – The Doston Jones Blog"

   Google "Gospels Not Written By Matthew, Mark, Luke or John – The Church Of Truth"

   Log in to Reply