50 Comments

  4. Joe, you called it on Pete completely in the first 30 seconds of talking about him, like more on target than anyone in the mainstream media ever gets. Pete was noted in the NYT nearly a year ago as being part of a "stop Bernie" group of donors and politicians. I'm sure they thought he was the perfect one to draw away young voters (young, check, gay, check, cutely speaks Norwegian on social media, check, skillfully plays guitar and piano on social media, check, wrote a high-school paper extolling the virtues of Bernie Sanders, check). Of course what he really turns out to be is an old centrists's fantasy of what they think young liberals would like. And a likely CIA operative, or something damn close, once you actually delve into his resume. Now he seems to have botnets and paid social media trolls trying to silence any critical voices or independent journalists who ask inconvenient questions, through downvotes, reporting, flagging as false, etc. I saw a totally factual and respectful answer on Quora that questioned his chances of winning the nomination due to low support among non-white voters, which had 88 upvotes (a fairly high number), yet was collapsed due to downvotes. Never seen such a thing before…

    Of course Buttigieg also managed to spike that last pre-caucus poll showing Sanders 1, Warren 2, Buttigieg 3, and Biden 4. Never ever heard of poll results being canceled and suppressed like that before. (Go figure, the poll was co-sponsored by CNN.)

    The coin toss was ridiculous, and yeah, wtf is up with all those people standing around like that was completely normal??

    The Democratic strategy seems to be to drain a delegate here and a delegate there from Sanders, one or two from each state, maybe more in big ones. Nobody will notice so long as Sanders wins each state right? Why would he complain if he already won? But they'll all add up, and reduce his chances of the straight win…

    In New Hampshire, I've heard a rumor that in the precincts that used AccuVote optical scanners the count was off with a 10 point or more discrepancy in Buttigieg's favor compared to polling, but within 1-2 points of polling in precincts that were hand counted. I really wish there was more information on this, because it could be a huge story if someone could confirm it. Plus wtf was up with the New Hampshire exit polling? They ran them, but I never saw any useful data. All I ever saw was the fragmented demographic breakdowns, but not the overall numbers, let alone overall numbers by precinct (or at least county). Gee, how convenient that the lack of exactly that data makes it impossible to actually compare to the vote count to look for discrepancies and likely cheating… And we're only two states in. Harry Reid still owns Nevada, wonder what kind of stink they'll be up to there.

    What we're seeing is the exposure of what's always been going on. The internet allows us to see past the gatekeepers in the media. None of this shit is ever reported in the news if they can help it. Now we can see the mainstream media is just propaganda. In Iowa, they didn't used to even track the popular vote count, the delegates were the delegates and we just had to trust them. Now we can see the delegate calculations have always been trash. Everything seems crazy, but what it means is we're waking up and becoming aware of the actual world around us. Kind of like in the Matrix. 😀

Leave a Reply

© 2024 FYTube Online - FYTube.Com

Partners: Omenirea.Ro , masini in rate