In this elaborated version, I once again go through the many Scriptures which “utterly destroy” the multiple incursion (of angels continuing to mate with women after the Flood) thesis. The Bible tells us exactly how the Post-Flood Nephilim came to be and who their fathers were. Thus, there’s no need whatsoever for any further speculation involving angels.
Video Source
42 Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Robby you keep publishing nonsense. You can not prove anything with scriptures
Rob…that was my thought too…about the separation of Pangea. I was thinking maybe when the fountains of the deep erupted it may have caused the continental separation. Awesome videos..thanks for all you do. God bless you brother!
When Ham entered his father's tent he also stole the garment of Adam; The same garment made by the hands of EYAH to clothe him, after the fall in the garden.
Cush was the son of Ham's old age and was dearly favored by Ham. Because of this favortism, Ham bequeathed, while living, to Cush the stolen garment of Adam, that he had taken from Noah's tent. Ham had hidden it away. The garment was given to nimrod by Cush. This garment carried great powers and was the reason for Nimrod having the great size and power he did. Nimrod was a great hunter in the face of EYAH not before EYAH. Nimrod was not righteous. He was large and powerful due to the garment of Adam given to him by his father Cush. It was part of the curse that became a genetic marker in his seedline.
This information is written in the ancient books of Jasher, Jubilees, etc…
The reason Canaan was cursed is because he was the first born son of Ham. The firstborn always carried on the family name, household name, and reputation. By cursing Canaan this birthright was abolished in Canaan.
Thanks for all your great work, Rob; you’ve brought anyone willing to listen a lot further along the path of understanding, on many topics. Like usual, this video is very helpful.
One of the most common operational mistakes that people make is to say “I BELIEVE blah blah blah…,” without reasoning as based on evidential support, regardless of worldview or degree of intelligence; very careless, lazy and, typically, prideful, and it leads one into all sorts of problems, up to an including eternal damnation. Of course, I’m not talking about our living faith, only about wishing something so because of an a priori agenda. Like the line from Spinal Tap “I know for I told me so…”
I shudder in fear and pray for immunity.
Another very common problem is an easy willingness to sidestep what should be our default approach to reading Scripture, that of the face-value and direct. We have an agenda, therefore, using the intrinsic power of language, we can make Scripture perform all kinds of linguistic magic tricks. Best example is probably the false doctrine of the pre-trib rapture.
Again, we should all approach ‘God’s Pearl’ with trembling, drop all agenda, study carefully and comprehensively, and ask God to give us understanding, and then depend on God’s abundant grace to guide and cover our humble hearts.