I've seen that Kubrick doc. It is bizarre. Really hope it is not real…..but it is fun…..Kissenger, Rumsvelt, head of the CIA, Bush Senior, Brezinski all of them laughing and joking about how easy it was to blackmail the director and use his footage (recorded at Pinewood Studios London) for the moon landings. He had some big camera they needed for the NASA footage, and in return he got a Pandora's box of secrets for his Space Odyssey movie. Then, of course, they killed him.
The man in charge of risk assessment for the entire Apollo program was Joseph Shea, a Ph.D level Engineer from New York. He was hired by NASA around 1963.
In 1967, his team of mathematicians, engineers, rocket scientists, medical doctors and meteorologists, nearly 30 professionals, made a determination of the chances for a successful Apollo moon mission.
Keep in mind, the NASA administrators required a 99.75% chance of success, before they would green light a launch.
Along those lines, NASA cancelled the Space Shuttle program when they recalculated the risk assessment. Prior to 1986, NASA calculated the risk of catastrophic mission failure was 1 in 100,000. After 2 Shuttles mission failures, they determined the risk was 1 in 100 or 1%. And that was too high.
Joseph Shea concluded in 1967, the chance of failure ( death of the entire Apollo crew) would be 95% per each launch. At least 10 crews, he concluded, would die before 1 landed on the moon.
That was bad news for NASA.
They had already spent more than $25 billion of taxpayers money into what was clearly a lost cause.
By 1968, the clock was ticking.
In April 1968, Stanley Kubrick released 2001 A Space Odyssey. As luck would have it, the high IQ genius who had helped Kubrick over the past 4 years, to make that movie, was Arthur C Clarke.
Clarke was a key advisor to NASA and friends with the very top NASA people in the Apollo program. He is seen in photos with top NASA administrators in the mid 1960's in London.
According to the film producer, Bart Sibrel, ( hated by NASA and trolls on all message boards ) he was leaked information that a staged moon landing was done in New Mexico at an Air Force base, under the eye of LBJ and other top military and gov officials.
It appears the editing of the film took a long time and might not have been completed until mid 1969.
What is important to note about Stanley Kubrick is that he had invented the Front Screen Projection film technique of backdrops, and it is obvious NASA folks used that film technique, to make black backgrounds in the scenes. Today, it looks very fake but NASA had no other option at the time and never guessed the film would be viewed millions of times by independent researchers.
The Bart Sibrel film – " A funny thing happened on the way to the Moon "offers proof after proof of the hoax. It can still be seen on YT.
One question folks will often ask, after seeing the Bart Sibrel film is, " If NASA faked the moon landing, wouldn't Russia would tell the world ".
That is a good question. Consider what Russia would get from that worldwide statement. Nothing.
Russia is smart. After all, they were 4-5 years ahead of NASA when they ended the moon mission program, after realizing the radiation barriers were IMPOSSIBLE to penetrate.
Russia was way too smart than to yell, " America is lying."
They blackmailed Nixon.
Some of the blackmail payoffs are known because they were too big and too obvious to hide from anyone. However, there is a good chance a lot of the blackmail package remains secret, and perhaps 90% of it remains unknown. But that is why Russia kept quiet in my view.
When I started questioning it was when they superimposed one picture over another from two different missions and they were exactly the same place
I've seen that Kubrick doc. It is bizarre. Really hope it is not real…..but it is fun…..Kissenger, Rumsvelt, head of the CIA, Bush Senior, Brezinski all of them laughing and joking about how easy it was to blackmail the director and use his footage (recorded at Pinewood Studios London) for the moon landings. He had some big camera they needed for the NASA footage, and in return he got a Pandora's box of secrets for his Space Odyssey movie. Then, of course, they killed him.
This guy is dumb
The man in charge of risk assessment for the entire Apollo program was Joseph Shea, a Ph.D level Engineer from New York. He was hired by NASA around 1963.
In 1967, his team of mathematicians, engineers, rocket scientists, medical doctors and meteorologists, nearly 30 professionals, made a determination of the chances for a successful Apollo moon mission.
Keep in mind, the NASA administrators required a 99.75% chance of success, before they would green light a launch.
Along those lines, NASA cancelled the Space Shuttle program when they recalculated the risk assessment. Prior to 1986, NASA calculated the risk of catastrophic mission failure was 1 in 100,000. After 2 Shuttles mission failures, they determined the risk was 1 in 100 or 1%. And that was too high.
Joseph Shea concluded in 1967, the chance of failure ( death of the entire Apollo crew) would be 95% per each launch. At least 10 crews, he concluded, would die before 1 landed on the moon.
That was bad news for NASA.
They had already spent more than $25 billion of taxpayers money into what was clearly a lost cause.
By 1968, the clock was ticking.
In April 1968, Stanley Kubrick released 2001 A Space Odyssey. As luck would have it, the high IQ genius who had helped Kubrick over the past 4 years, to make that movie, was Arthur C Clarke.
Clarke was a key advisor to NASA and friends with the very top NASA people in the Apollo program. He is seen in photos with top NASA administrators in the mid 1960's in London.
According to the film producer, Bart Sibrel, ( hated by NASA and trolls on all message boards ) he was leaked information that a staged moon landing was done in New Mexico at an Air Force base, under the eye of LBJ and other top military and gov officials.
It appears the editing of the film took a long time and might not have been completed until mid 1969.
What is important to note about Stanley Kubrick is that he had invented the Front Screen Projection film technique of backdrops, and it is obvious NASA folks used that film technique, to make black backgrounds in the scenes. Today, it looks very fake but NASA had no other option at the time and never guessed the film would be viewed millions of times by independent researchers.
The Bart Sibrel film – " A funny thing happened on the way to the Moon "offers proof after proof of the hoax. It can still be seen on YT.
One question folks will often ask, after seeing the Bart Sibrel film is, " If NASA faked the moon landing, wouldn't Russia would tell the world ".
That is a good question. Consider what Russia would get from that worldwide statement. Nothing.
Russia is smart. After all, they were 4-5 years ahead of NASA when they ended the moon mission program, after realizing the radiation barriers were IMPOSSIBLE to penetrate.
Russia was way too smart than to yell, " America is lying."
They blackmailed Nixon.
Some of the blackmail payoffs are known because they were too big and too obvious to hide from anyone. However, there is a good chance a lot of the blackmail package remains secret, and perhaps 90% of it remains unknown. But that is why Russia kept quiet in my view.
loool, what is astrophysics? it's physics. period.
another fancy bull****.