2) Wuhan lab leak theory. If you read the back of a cleaning product bottle that says "kill 99 percent of germs", it lists "Such as" and follows with Influenza, coronavirus, norovirus, etc.
That's because they are the most common viruses in the world. Meaning, every lab studies Coronavirus. Meaning, every grant awarded by the US government to study viruses in other countries will have coronavirus studied in the building. Meaning, EVEN IF it came out of a lab, or an animal, odds are there was going to be a grant given by the US to whatever lab leaked it.
This is no conspiracy. There is no "Truth". Some of the best questions coming from JRE are absolutely logical for someone uneducated in the science of virology. The problem is, you have to ignore EVERY bit of evidence and every reasonable answer to still believe in a conspiracy.
1) "Breakthrough Cases". I hate this term. This term came from mainstream media's misunderstanding of how vaccines work. It is a known fact that vaccines will never be 100 percent effective on every person, since each individuals immune response is different to both viruses and vaccines. When people say "I know someone that had a breakthrough case, so if it doesn't work, why should I get it?", it merely shows you that you dont understand vaccine 101.
Lets look at the MMR vaccine – 99 percent effective against measles. If you know 100 people, it is expected that you would have seen a "breakthrough case" back when the vaccine first came out. When everyone usually got measles once in their life. Scientists aren't scratching their heads like "Wha happened?". The Mumps part is 95 percent effective. If you know 100 people, 5 will have "breakthrough cases". And the Rubella part is 90 percent effective. If you know 100 people, 10 will have had "breakthrough cases".
That is literally published information given to you in a pamphlet for EVERY SINGLE VACCINE.
Knowing this, In order to decrease the number of cases, you need a certain percent of the population vaccinated based on it's effectiveness. The less effective, the more people must be vaccinated.
It's simple math. Not even algebra.
if 1 person gets measles, on average, it would spread to 15 others. You need to think of each spreading generation like a family tree.
Now, 100 percent of the population is vaccinated with a "breakthrough" rate of 1 percent. 100 people from the US visit England and are all vaccinated and exposed to measles. 1 will likely still get it and bring it back to the states because the vaccine is only 99 percent effective. only 1 out of seven times (100/15, the average number of unvaccinated spread), would 1 other vaccinated person get measles. 1st generation 1. 2nd spread, 0. Repeat. Lets say this happens 7 times. It would go, 1st generation, 1 case. 2nd generation, 1 case, 3rd generation 0. (now it would require this to happen 49 times (7×7) before it ever spread beyond 3 people.
Now, do the same thing but assuming only 50 percent of the population got the measles vaccine. 100 people go to England. 50 are vaccinated, 50 aren't. All are exposed. 50.5 people (the 50 unvaccinated and the 1 out of 100 (.5) vaccinated) become carriers.
Since half the population is unvaxxed, the spread rate is almost halved. Lets round down in your favor and say 7 (since rounding up to 8 only hurts your case).
The one vaccinated spreads it to 7. and the 50 unvaxed spread it to 7. First Generation, 51 cases. 2nd Generation, 357 cases. 3rd generation, 2499 cases.
So, even though half the population got the Measles vaccine, a single case can grow exponentially. Not as fast as a fully unvaccinated population, but nevertheless, the number of cases will never go away.
This is why they have a target goal of percentage of population to get vaccinated to avoid outbreaks. (clusters of cases rather than 1 or occasionally 2).
The Goal Rate for measles is %95 vaccinated.
Lets redo the scenario.
100 people go to England. 5 unvaccinated, and 95 vaccinated. All are exposed to measles. 0 vaccinated contract it. (But lets imagine 1 got it). All 5 unvaccinated contract it. 1st generation = 6 cases. (since 19/20 people are vaccinated, and before on average you spread to 15 people, (of the 15 people, 5 percent of which is unvaccinated, or 15x.05 = .75). Meaning, each case is now spread to only .75 or less than 1 person. 2nd generation = 6x.75 or 4.5 cases. 3rd generational spread = 3.375 cases 4th generation = 2.53125 cases. 5th generation, less than 2, 6th generation less than 1 and a half.
Result? when the target population goal is met, the spread rate of the virus is known, the efficacy of the vaccine is known, NO MATTER WHAT, there will still be cases, but they decline with each passing. If the target population goal is not met, the virus comes back. The spread rate is still slower, but the cases increase with each new spreading cycle.
So literally, when we knew the spread rate, we knew the vaccine efficacy rate, and we set a goal, and 50 percent of the population created the first vaccine conspiracy after 1 million americans died and then said "SEE I KNEW THE VACCINE WOULDN"T WORK!".
Well, yes stupid. So did we. We could have ended it much sooner if we believed the professionals or did elementary grade math.
Hey y'all.. I'm taking a moment to comment and I will tell you why… I just stopped the video to post and it told me false information did I want to post anyway and I did
2) Wuhan lab leak theory. If you read the back of a cleaning product bottle that says "kill 99 percent of germs", it lists "Such as" and follows with Influenza, coronavirus, norovirus, etc.
That's because they are the most common viruses in the world. Meaning, every lab studies Coronavirus. Meaning, every grant awarded by the US government to study viruses in other countries will have coronavirus studied in the building. Meaning, EVEN IF it came out of a lab, or an animal, odds are there was going to be a grant given by the US to whatever lab leaked it.
It's basically a moot point.
This is no conspiracy. There is no "Truth". Some of the best questions coming from JRE are absolutely logical for someone uneducated in the science of virology. The problem is, you have to ignore EVERY bit of evidence and every reasonable answer to still believe in a conspiracy.
1) "Breakthrough Cases". I hate this term. This term came from mainstream media's misunderstanding of how vaccines work. It is a known fact that vaccines will never be 100 percent effective on every person, since each individuals immune response is different to both viruses and vaccines. When people say "I know someone that had a breakthrough case, so if it doesn't work, why should I get it?", it merely shows you that you dont understand vaccine 101.
Lets look at the MMR vaccine – 99 percent effective against measles. If you know 100 people, it is expected that you would have seen a "breakthrough case" back when the vaccine first came out. When everyone usually got measles once in their life. Scientists aren't scratching their heads like "Wha happened?". The Mumps part is 95 percent effective. If you know 100 people, 5 will have "breakthrough cases". And the Rubella part is 90 percent effective. If you know 100 people, 10 will have had "breakthrough cases".
That is literally published information given to you in a pamphlet for EVERY SINGLE VACCINE.
Knowing this, In order to decrease the number of cases, you need a certain percent of the population vaccinated based on it's effectiveness. The less effective, the more people must be vaccinated.
It's simple math. Not even algebra.
if 1 person gets measles, on average, it would spread to 15 others. You need to think of each spreading generation like a family tree.
%100 percent unvaccinated population. 1st generation. 1 Case. 2nd spready 15 cases (1×15). 3rd generation 225 cases (15×15). 4th generation. 3375 cases (225×15).
Now, 100 percent of the population is vaccinated with a "breakthrough" rate of 1 percent.
100 people from the US visit England and are all vaccinated and exposed to measles. 1 will likely still get it and bring it back to the states because the vaccine is only 99 percent effective. only 1 out of seven times (100/15, the average number of unvaccinated spread), would 1 other vaccinated person get measles. 1st generation 1. 2nd spread, 0. Repeat. Lets say this happens 7 times. It would go, 1st generation, 1 case. 2nd generation, 1 case, 3rd generation 0. (now it would require this to happen 49 times (7×7) before it ever spread beyond 3 people.
Now, do the same thing but assuming only 50 percent of the population got the measles vaccine. 100 people go to England. 50 are vaccinated, 50 aren't. All are exposed. 50.5 people (the 50 unvaccinated and the 1 out of 100 (.5) vaccinated) become carriers.
Since half the population is unvaxxed, the spread rate is almost halved. Lets round down in your favor and say 7 (since rounding up to 8 only hurts your case).
The one vaccinated spreads it to 7. and the 50 unvaxed spread it to 7. First Generation, 51 cases. 2nd Generation, 357 cases. 3rd generation, 2499 cases.
So, even though half the population got the Measles vaccine, a single case can grow exponentially. Not as fast as a fully unvaccinated population, but nevertheless, the number of cases will never go away.
This is why they have a target goal of percentage of population to get vaccinated to avoid outbreaks. (clusters of cases rather than 1 or occasionally 2).
The Goal Rate for measles is %95 vaccinated.
Lets redo the scenario.
100 people go to England. 5 unvaccinated, and 95 vaccinated. All are exposed to measles.
0 vaccinated contract it. (But lets imagine 1 got it). All 5 unvaccinated contract it.
1st generation = 6 cases. (since 19/20 people are vaccinated, and before on average you spread to 15 people, (of the 15 people, 5 percent of which is unvaccinated, or 15x.05 = .75).
Meaning, each case is now spread to only .75 or less than 1 person. 2nd generation = 6x.75 or 4.5 cases. 3rd generational spread = 3.375 cases 4th generation = 2.53125 cases. 5th generation, less than 2, 6th generation less than 1 and a half.
Result? when the target population goal is met, the spread rate of the virus is known, the efficacy of the vaccine is known, NO MATTER WHAT, there will still be cases, but they decline with each passing. If the target population goal is not met, the virus comes back. The spread rate is still slower, but the cases increase with each new spreading cycle.
So literally, when we knew the spread rate, we knew the vaccine efficacy rate, and we set a goal, and 50 percent of the population created the first vaccine conspiracy after 1 million americans died and then said "SEE I KNEW THE VACCINE WOULDN"T WORK!".
Well, yes stupid. So did we. We could have ended it much sooner if we believed the professionals or did elementary grade math.
Hey y'all.. I'm taking a moment to comment and I will tell you why… I just stopped the video to post and it told me false information did I want to post anyway and I did
Coming back in 2024 thanks to the stupid WHO
That would be fatphobic joe