what he says is nonsense, he thinks there's one 'time' when in fact there are different 'time's for every point in the universe, some run faster than others based on entropy factors
I always saw it as imaginary tree with each branch glowing lighter as the repetitions of the same event have multiplied in their repetitions of each universes new reiteration.
Some ways in which our history has already unraveled millions of times, some other have collapsed on the quantum level into paths repeated merely thousands of times.
We are in the latter timeline now: the one percent unique way of history playing out (at least in relation to my personal perspective).
I could only wonder how it looks from the ultimate, Godly level: yet, I still dob’t know that and realize that I may never truly come to know.
For how one could know that what he sees is really all that there could ever be? A complete perspective could also be just an illusion. How does a single drop perceive a whole surrounding sea? – it evaporates higher into the clouds -power gives perspective, yet how could one know there really is no higher high to ever climb?
– See: thats the conundrum.
…for there could always be something that You do not know, that You do not know.
Just in case anybody else is here here because they're studying Nietzsche's eternal reccurrence this is probably one of the better explainer videos on YouTube the others are all academic explanations and trust me the videos are a long waste of time just listen to this guy over and over.
Nietzsche doesn't say eternal recurrence is true. It's a thought experiment in which he says, how would we live if we knew there was an eternal recurrence. Half-knowledge can be very misleading and damaging.
what he says is nonsense, he thinks there's one 'time' when in fact there are different 'time's for every point in the universe, some run faster than others based on entropy factors
I always saw it as imaginary tree with each branch glowing lighter as the repetitions of the same event have multiplied in their repetitions of each universes new reiteration.
Some ways in which our history has already unraveled millions of times, some other have collapsed on the quantum level into paths repeated merely thousands of times.
We are in the latter timeline now: the one percent unique way of history playing out (at least in relation to my personal perspective).
I could only wonder how it looks from the ultimate, Godly level: yet, I still dob’t know that and realize that I may never truly come to know.
For how one could know that what he sees is really all that there could ever be? A complete perspective could also be just an illusion. How does a single drop perceive a whole surrounding sea? – it evaporates higher into the clouds -power gives perspective, yet how could one know there really is no higher high to ever climb?
– See: thats the conundrum.
…for there could always be something that You do not know, that You do not know.
Be healthy! 💜
Just in case anybody else is here here because they're studying Nietzsche's eternal reccurrence this is probably one of the better explainer videos on YouTube the others are all academic explanations and trust me the videos are a long waste of time just listen to this guy over and over.
If time’s an illusion and everything is a fever dream, how do you explain scars and tattoos?
Nietzsche doesn't say eternal recurrence is true. It's a thought experiment in which he says, how would we live if we knew there was an eternal recurrence. Half-knowledge can be very misleading and damaging.