►Speech is completely original and produced exclusively by Grace Digital Network
►Music licensed through Artlist.io
►Footage licensed through Filmpac.com and Storyblocks
►Animation: Tina Davidson
►Writer: David Kolawole
All scripture animations are derived from the King James Bible (KJB) or simply the Authorized Version (AV)
Our purpose, when making these videos, is to make quality educational motivational videos and share these with our viewers.
Note: We own copyright to the footages and background music used in this video.
———————————————————-
Title: What Will Happen During & After The Millennium Reign?
———————————————————-
CONTACT INFORMATION:
Grace Digital Network email:
[email protected]
Support:
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/gracedigital
Grace Digital Network Website:
———————————————————-
Our work is original and drastically rearranged with unique editing to bring the best from the message. Creative effects are added to highlight certain areas in the message. when there are two or more speakers it is done in a conversational manner meaning they complete each other sentences while staying on topic, intermittent sampling is also applied.
Video Source
missed sexually immoral
❤🙏🏽♥
No millennial reign of Christ anywhere in the Bible. Either you don't read the Bible and are just parroting what everyone else is teaching or you're lying.
Amen and amen. Praise the Lord.😇❤🙏
I thought I commented on this video about a month ago but I don’t see my comment now so here is a comment similar to the one I thought I posted in February:
I’m 79. For most of my lifetime, the majority of conservative Christians in the United States have been taught an interpretation of Bible prophecy similar to the one in this video BUT
1: The majority of those conservative Christians are totally unaware that A) The method of interpretation most popular in northern Europe from the sixteenth through the eighteenth centuries was premillennial but based on an entirely different premise, i.e. that Christians should look for fulfillment of Bible prophecies in the past and the present as well as in the future. B) During those same centuries, the interpretation most popular in southern Europe was that the prophecies had already been fulfilled, i.e. that the Church was the kingdom of God on Earth and that references to a new Earth would be fulfilled gradually as Christians expanded their influence worldwide. C) Beginning in the eighteenth century and throughout the nineteenth century, the interpretation most popular in the United States was postmillennialism, i.e. that Jesus would return AFTER a thousand years of intense worldwide evangelism/missionary work during which time the majority of civil governments and other institutions would become Christian. D) The interpretation in this video was developed in Ireland in the nineteenth century but remained unknown in the United States until after the War Between the States.
2: The method of interpretation on which this video is based fails to provide satisfactory answers to the following questions:
Was the prophecy of Jonah conditional?
Did either God or Jonah say it was conditional?
If Jonah’s prophecy was conditional, is it likely that SOME other Bible prophecies were (or are) also conditional?
Was the gospel preached to Abraham? (Galatians 3:8)
If Christians are people who have faith in the Messiah, were Abraham and other Hebrew patriarchs and prophets Christians by that definition?
Were some of the restoration prophecies fulfilled after the Babylonian captivity in the sixth century B.C.?
Who will inherit what was promised to Abraham? (Galatians 3:29) For further study, see also Romans 4 and the rest of Galatians 3.
What is represented by the olive tree in Romans 11? Israel? The Church? Both? It is true that, beginning at the Exodus and ending after the reign of Solomon, there was a nation of Israel. After the division of the kingdom, did the promises to Israel apply to the northern kingdom (which continued to be called “Israel”)? Or did they apply to the southern kingdom of Judah? Who (or what) is the “holy nation” mentioned in I Peter 2:9? Is that the same as the olive tree of Romans 11?
Based on Romans 11:23 & 24, is it likely that, before Jesus returns, a higher percentage of Hebrews than non-Hebrews will consider the evidence that Jesus really is the Messiah foretold by the Hebrew prophets of antiquity and thus become the children of Abraham by faith – not merely the children of Abraham by physical lineage? Compare Matthew 3:9; Matthew 8:5-13; Romans 2:28 & 29.
Did the seventieth week of Daniel’s seventy week prophecy (Daniel 9) begin in A.D. 27 at the baptism of Jesus (483 years after the commandment to restore and to rebuild Jerusalem), was Jesus crucified in A.D. 31 (in the middle of that seventieth week of years) and did the seventieth week end in A.D. 34 when Paul and Barnabas said, “It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you: but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles.” (Acts 13:26) (when Stephen was stoned and the gospel went to the non-Hebrews)? Or will the seventieth week be fulfilled sometime in the future? i.e. Is there a “gap” between the sixty-ninth and the seventeenth week?
The tribe of Judah was Jewish (The word, Jew, is derived from the name of ONE of the great-grandsons of Abraham.) None of the other sons of Israel (aka Jacob) were Jewish. Neither was Moses Jewish. He was of the tribe of Levi. There is more to this subject but maybe this is enough to get you started.
Is it literally true that he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God? (Romans 2:28:29)