"If I can have an opinion, can god have an opinion?" Irrelevant. I exist. You exist. There is credible, tangible evidence supporting those claims. The same cannot be said of god. If god doesn't exist then it doesn't do anything, such as have an opinion. I have no reason to care about the feelings of something non- existent; provide evidence of existence before attempting a guilt trip over "gagging him". And it only follows that of course god doesn't believe atheists exist, because it doesn't believe anything, because it doesn't do anything, because it doesn't exist.
Off the Kirb should be able to provide me evidence of God's existence since he even knows what God believes. Please, share your evidence with me. I'm open to it.
No offense but these arguments and points are obviously devised by someone who has never done their homework into what atheism actually is, and the reasons behind why most atheists hold the belief that they do.
Let's expose part of the problem right away.
The claims you made rely on you to believe that the bible is true, yet you can't provide any contemporary evidence that supports one word of the bible.
But we know that the bible is unreliable. Even the very passage of the bible that you discussed brings up red lights as to it's reliability.
You presumably believe that the gospels are eye witness testimonies, but please tell me who were the eye witnesses present when Jesus was supposedly on trial with Pilate? This wasn't a public trial like we have now, it was a private hearing not a single one of the apostles were present to make an account of what was and wasn't said.
In other words the gospel writer made up the conversation that Jesus and Pilate had, including the part where Pilate says he finds no fault with this man.
But there is a further problem with this story. According to the gospel of Luke Pilate sent Jesus to see King Herod, the problem is we know from historical data that Pilate ruled over Jerusalem between 26-36 AD and King Herod died about 4 BC, so they were never in power at the same time, therefore we know that Luke's account contains lies.
Dude I have just been watching your videos like all day no breaks.
They are so good on your mind.
"If you can have an opinion, then god can have an opinion"
Well no, it would depend on the ontology of said god, if it has ontology at all. So it only took you 5 seconds to mess up basic philosophy.
"If I can have an opinion, can god have an opinion?"
Irrelevant. I exist. You exist. There is credible, tangible evidence supporting those claims. The same cannot be said of god. If god doesn't exist then it doesn't do anything, such as have an opinion. I have no reason to care about the feelings of something non- existent; provide evidence of existence before attempting a guilt trip over "gagging him". And it only follows that of course god doesn't believe atheists exist, because it doesn't believe anything, because it doesn't do anything, because it doesn't exist.
Off the Kirb should be able to provide me evidence of God's existence since he even knows what God believes. Please, share your evidence with me. I'm open to it.
No offense but these arguments and points are obviously devised by someone who has never done their homework into what atheism actually is, and the reasons behind why most atheists hold the belief that they do.
Let's expose part of the problem right away.
The claims you made rely on you to believe that the bible is true, yet you can't provide any contemporary evidence that supports one word of the bible.
But we know that the bible is unreliable. Even the very passage of the bible that you discussed brings up red lights as to it's reliability.
You presumably believe that the gospels are eye witness testimonies, but please tell me who were the eye witnesses present when Jesus was supposedly on trial with Pilate? This wasn't a public trial like we have now, it was a private hearing not a single one of the apostles were present to make an account of what was and wasn't said.
In other words the gospel writer made up the conversation that Jesus and Pilate had, including the part where Pilate says he finds no fault with this man.
But there is a further problem with this story. According to the gospel of Luke Pilate sent Jesus to see King Herod, the problem is we know from historical data that Pilate ruled over Jerusalem between 26-36 AD and King Herod died about 4 BC, so they were never in power at the same time, therefore we know that Luke's account contains lies.