Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg admits they will use Planes and not Satellites to deliver Internet. In his first public tour of the new Head Quarters Mark shows a small model of a satellite but proceeds to inform the viewers that it is with their planes they will beam the internet down with.
Facebook admits that they will be using planes to beam internet down to countries that don’t have access in the future. That’s right with all the satellites they say are in space this would make the most sense but of course if you research you find that the satellites orbiting in space talk has been a lie. This is just another proof showing that a media internet giant such as Facebook will be using planes to deliver internet and not satellites! Maybe because they don’t exist as we’ve been told.
Original video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVsUwF4L6Nc
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted.
“Fair Use” guidelines: www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html
Video Source
I have a question on this satellite thing. I am not a troll, this is a real question.
But first, I would really like to thank you for the awesome work you are doing with this idea.
Wouldn't satellites also be supported on the flat earth?
You see, there is no gravity to pull those things down, only flotation in a fluid (which happens to be air). However, flotation depends on being a fluid. Could it not be possible to there being a thin or not so thin layer of real vacum or very near vacum before the dome?
Such a layer would make it possible for satellites and such to "orbit" the earth, since the law of lotation would not pull the "satellite" down. It would also point to why you can actually get response back from satellites, which is something I have not seen a satisfactory answer to. Having personally worked with satellites, I know for sure that they are there, or else you could not link to remote computer systems over a real satellite link.
I am a computer engineer. I have personally set up satellite internet links over parabollic antenas at various sites. I know those things really work as advertized. Either a real satellite, a space boat that sails across the plane as a boat or some other method to fake a satellite is required.
Beleive me… it is one thing when you hear it done, it is something entirely different when you actually control the antena's position and you cannot get the link unless you point it to the right direction for the satellite, and it is always the same direction.
Now, why do satellites have an "usefull lifetime" and after so many years they fall down? That never made sense to me, if there is no atmosphere on space, what brings them down? However, if the satellites are in an area under the dome where there is just a tiny bit of air, it would make sense. I know you beleive not in rockets in space. If they where real, I beleive that they are (not their supposed destinations, but wheather or not they work in space), you could send a device up there that would stay on a minimal atmosphere zone with little push.
This will also explain polar satellites, as looking through the satellite routes reveal that no satellites fly over the actual poles, but they come near to them. The flat earthers say that they want to avoid the holes to the inner Earth… Could they simply be avoiding collision? Could they be using their rockets to change course?
This model would also make it possible to hang on a sattelite over ANY particular point on the plane, not just on the equator as they claim. However, doing so would have dire consecuenses to the globe model…
Before I close, I would like to tell you that your exposé has won me over. Thanks.
It's so easy to take things out of context, like cutting him off at the right moment.
Satellite coverage is sparse in many areas of the world, thus the need for those Facebook planes.
http://www.theverge.com/2015/7/30/9074925/facebook-aquila-solar-internet-plane
"Facebook's plans to become a flying internet service provider for the developing world are coming to fruition. The company today introduced Aquila, a high-flying, long-endurance plane that will bring basic internet access to the developing world. A working model of the plane is now ready for testing, Facebook said.
Facebook's shallow, V-shaped plane has the wingspan of a Boeing 737. But even fully loaded down with communications gear, Aquila only weighs between 880 to 1,000 lbs — about a third the weight of a Prius. "When deployed, it will be able to circle a remote region for up to 90 days, beaming connectivity down to people from an altitude of 60,000 to 90,000 [feet]," the company said in a blog post. This means the planes will be flying at an altitude above commercial aircraft, and even above the weather.
Great vid!2 contradicting points you've uncovered!1- Why not use the satellites already in orbit providing internet to blanket everywhere?2- Why would the need for a plane to beam down internet if satellites do it already?Funny so many ball Earthers will state we get our internet from satellites. Well apparently NOT!
Did Facebook admit they can't beam Internet from Satellites? It's strange to build a satellite and not use it. Why use planes to deliver the Internet to countries that don't have it if you could just access the technology they claim they have from space?