THE Moon landings between 1969 and 1972 never took place and were staged by the US intelligence community, a controversial filmmaker has claimed.
Bart Sibrel claims he has proof the CIA orchestrated the famous Apollo 11 moon landing – and believes no one has ever stepped on the lunar surface because it is too dangerous.
Speaking exclusively to Daily Star Online, Sibrel reckons mankind would have set up bases by now if it was possible to travel to the moon.
And he believes the historic event took place in a film set and the crew were actors given instructions by the CIA through ear pieces.
Rockets designed in the 1960s, according to Sibrel, were unable to exit the Earth’s orbit and would never be able to resist a deadly radiation belt en route to the Moon.
Yet the manned Apollo 11 lunar landing on July 20, 1969, is regarded as one of humanity’s greatest achievements. Read more at: http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/474121/Bart-Sibrel-interview-moon-landings-hoax
Celebrate Truth John 14:6. Blessings.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted.
“Fair Use” guidelines: www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html
Video Source
ok… who started this flat earth prank? its going to far…. just stop
All moon-landing deniers believe in Flat Earth. But not all Flat Earthers believe in Moon landings.
00:25 The Daily Star seems to have not noticed that Sibrel made the video in 2001 and it has been debunked on a regular basis since then, because hoaxers don't seem to realise just how stupid Sibrel's claims are.
The Daily Star is not a serious newspaper, it is a rag that will print anything that it thinks will sell another copy. It makes the National Enquirer seem like a serious news medium.
Sibrel claimed that, if man had travelled to the moon, there would now be bases there. This shows the man's abject ignorance. The cost of transporting building materials would be beyond any nation on Earth. There is no air on the moon – massive amounts would have to be transported, as well as food and water, once the infrastructure to store all these provisions had been built. How many missions to the moon would be needed to even create a living area?
01:46 Rocket technology was not advanced enough to leave Earth's atmosphere.
Another unsbstantiated claim. Sibrel offers no data to support his claim. Is easy to make idiotic claims, but another to prove i. Sibrel doesn't make any sort effort to provide proof.
01:49 They would never be able to resist the deadly radiation belt. This again proves that Sibrel had no idea what he was talking about. The "deadly radiation belt" is named after the man that discovered it – Dr James van Allen. He was also responsible for planning the Apollo's trajectory through the VARB. Seems unlikely that if van Allen believed the belts to be so deadly that he would send them through it – the belts only extend for 20° above and below the equator.
02:27 Video never released to the public. This is utter nonsense, the video has been on general release on DVD for a couple of decades.
I couldn't be bothered listening to any more of what Sibrel had to say. it's all nonsense.
Perhaps, if there was some substance to all his claims he would successful enough not to need to work as a taxi driver.
I can zoom with my camera very close to the moon . We should be able to easily zoom so close we can see man size details on the moon. We should be able to easily zoom up on the LEM , the moon buggy and all other equipment left behind. Why doesn't NASA do this and have many other confirmed sightings?
Nobody has been to the moon!