In this video, I read from the book Zetetic Astronomy: Earth Not a Globe by Dr. Samuel Rowbatham. IF the testimonies concerning the moon going into full lunar eclipse while the sun is still up are true, then, the standard model must be false. If the standard model is false, what then causes the lunar eclipse? According to the numerous sources cited, apparently a “dark orb” of some sort (perhaps a “Nibiru” style satellite?) obscures the moon. I also found an interesting ancient Hindu belief along those lines. If nothing else, it’s interesting food for thought.
Video Source
29 Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I love how he states facts as having been disproven without evidence, followed by mythological mumbo jumbo, also without evidence. A vid of word salad…. Sorry but this does not mesh with observable reality.
0:51 nobody thinks the phases of the moon is caused by earth's shadow. https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phases_of_the_Moon
3:09 Earth being between sun and moon is only impossible in your dumb flat earth model, not in globe model.
3:23 So the moon is self illuminating, why then is it when you zoom into moon you don't see any light being generated from its surface.
Why the moon is red?
13:35 The sun is not a red light, it has all the wavelength of light that's why when dispersed a rainbow forms. If it's just red light, you can't explain rainbows.
14:35 That's a false analogy, light can be absorbed infinitely but with time build heat energy. For example, black color absorbs light that's why it's black, if light can saturate the black color, then a black item with your analogy will change color upon long time exposure to light, which we all know is both dumb and outright false.
16:42 That's the most hilarious explanation in the history of flat earth explanations, so lunar eclipse for flat earthers is called when a black imaginary body passes between moon and earth, wow who believes this nonesense.
17:19 So to flat earthers we also have a transparent moon circling the earth, hahahahahahaha and I thought had heard it all.
21:00 So since some 18th century BC book said stars are invisible it means there exists dark invisible moons, that's pretty outstretched.
So in conclusion, to disapprove lunar eclipse, flat earthers have to create the ridiculous assumption that Moon is a star that generates its own light, invent another invisible moon which is transparent and only becomes translucent during lunar eclipses and changes to being transparent till the next lunar eclipse, and the proof of this is some 19th century guy looked in the stars and saw it as invisible and said yes that's the proof of invisible moon, and this Rob Skiba guy said since dark mater is discusses so that's it, when he forgets dark matter is a black hole so in retrospect he's saying we have a black hole as a moon, wow total lunacy, pun intended.
Why do we see earths shadow during a lunar eclipse?
why is the moon always only seen from one side?
hello flat-earthers, just came here to lol at you ^^