Taken from JRE #1500 w/Barbara Freese: https://youtu.be/cP0D2_jhqPU
Video Source
28 Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Taken from JRE #1500 w/Barbara Freese: https://youtu.be/cP0D2_jhqPU
Video Source
You must be logged in to post a comment.
The ozone layer is closing. That's one reason why were warming up. The heat can't escape.
There is an epidemic of science fraud. Many science journals and videos are dedicated to exposing them. This is one of them. The "scientist" who got credit for the CFC theory was Mario Molina, a chemist, not a physicist or climatologist. There was a convoluted theory, a summary published even in Popular Mechanics. It was debunked by many of his peers. It has never been proved. The ozone hole is not healing, it was never sick. It is a seasonal phenomenon and natural. A Japanese scientist proved the reason it is seasonal is because of solar wind shear. In the summer the Arctic is tilted towards the sun and the upper atmosphere is stripped away. In the winter it is tilted away and the hole recovers. The opposite is true for Antarctica. If you screech loud enough and long enough it becomes Consensus Science or peudoscience, fake. Same applies to CO2 causing climate change, Consensus Science. And on and on with the fraud.
Doctor Michael Crichton explains, here is an excerpt in case the link at the end doesn't work:
"I want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus, and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you're being had. Let's be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it's consensus, it isn't science. If it's science, it isn't consensus. Period." https://www.heartland.org/_template-assets/documents/publications/16253.pdf
coincidentally the ozone scare started right around the time Dow chemical's pattent on freon
Freon is heavy- cannot get to ozone layer or poles.
Dupont patent on Ozone was up. MRNA sales model.
https://youtu.be/Ruq7PxAuTtQ?si=q6eLZ8uZf6fEmqov
ITS A TOTAL SCAM!! Ozone needs UV light to form.
NO UV light in South pole in winter.
It's that simple.