Refuting the Sethite Theory and the Concept of Multiple Incursions FYTube



Anyone who has actually studied ancient literature – especially that of the Hebrews – will tell you that the unanimous view regarding the “sons of God” in Genesis 6 was that of angels. The completely bogus and entirely unsubstantiated so-called “Sethite Theory” didn’t even show up until about 160 to 200 years after Christ. In fact, that theory fails on so many levels, it’s hard to believe anyone actually still subscribes to the idea.

This video then moves into refuting the equally unsubstantiated view of multiple incursions (the idea that angles continued to return and mate with women again and again). There are NO supporting Scriptures to confirm the usual assumptions people have regarding Genesis 6:4. Furthermore, the text itself refutes the idea when you factor in the context given in the book of Enoch. In my mind, Genesis 9:18,19 is the smoking gun though. It obliterates any notion that Moses had multiple incursions in mind when he described how the WHOLE EARTH WAS POPULATED – writing nearly a thousand years after the Flood. The Table of Nations in Genesis 10 further nullifies the whole argument, wherein Moses tells us exactly where ALL of the post-Flood, Biblical giants came from (most notably, Ham’s son Canaan).

Video Source

24 Comments

  1. Instead of 'a ball' or 'the ball'  I just say 'globe'. Like 'what is the diameter of globe earth.'    Anyway, the coordinates and other odd occurances of occultic symbology in reference to globe and solar system meas wouldn't become irrelevant, but actually stronger evidence of lies from deceiver attempting to twist all things good for it's own purpose.

  2. Hey Rob keep up the great work man.  A small favor?  I'm trying to remember the sentence/statement derived from nasa mission first names. I just remember it was pretty striking, and got reminded when watching this great vid on occult symbolism in nasa.  =Lfkta0IT26w

  3. Rob, good short presentation regarding sons of God cohabiting with daughters of men.
    For those Christians that object to the use of other books to support the Biblical view of Robs presentation – check – 2 Peter and Jude that should be sufficient for you. When you study Bible, please read very carefully the book of Revelation.

  4. I have a rather odd series of questions. What language would Adam and Eve have spoken? Are there any texted or scripture that points to that information? Is there any correlation between biblical scripture and cave paintings possibly dated to same era? Basically there has to be something that refutes the half-life calculation of Uranium 238. Because of not, almost all claims of creationism of the Earths true age are mute. Im a believer in The Only God and his Son. But Christianity is really starting to look completely outlandish and according to secular views, not even worth debating anymore. Even I'm starting to kinda look at it, lets just say differently. I'm sure we can all agree mathematics is most definitely A Sign From God. Absolute irrefutable evidence, in my opinion, that the Biblical God exists. However if true, then U-238 Calculations are absolute. I understand the science realm CANNOT physically see the parent Isotopes, but math is math isn't it?

  5. I agree with you on everything except on the multiple incursions theory I believe that the texts of the Annunaki tell us that the angles came down again after the flood and when you listen to the history they claim its the opposite perspective of the Bible with them being the righteous which is the same as Lucifer or Prometheus etc just as they are doing now does know one else wonder why Aliens abduct us and experiment to make their offspring normal looking to infiltrate by stealth as its the great deception. There's my theory take it or leave it.

Leave a Reply

© 2024 FYTube Online - FYTube.Com

Partners: Omenirea.Ro , masini in rate